Challenges to Validate Multi-physics Model of Liver Tumor Radiofrequency Ablation from Pre-clinical Data

International audienceThe planning and interventional guidance of liver tumor ra-diofrequency ablation (RFA) is difficult due to the cooling effect of large vessels and the large variability of tissue parameters. Subject-specific modeling of RFA is challenging as it requires the knowledge of model geometry and hemodynamics as well as the simulation of heat transfer and cell death mechanisms. In this paper, we propose to validate such a model from pre-operative multi-modal images and intra-operative signals (temperature and power) measured by the ablation device itself. In particular , the RFA computation becomes subject-specific after three levels of personalization: anatomical, heat transfer and a novel cellular necro-sis model. We propose an end-to-end pre-clinical validation framework that considers the most comprehensive dataset for model validation. This framework can also be used for parameter estimation and we evaluate its predictive power in order to fully assess the possibility to personalize our model in the future. Such a framework would therefore not require any necrosis information, thus better suited for clinical applications. We evaluated our approach on seven ablations from three healthy pigs. The predictive power of the model was tested: a mean point to mesh error between predicted and actual ablation extent of 3.5 mm was achieved

Comprehensive Pre-Clinical Evaluation of a Multi-physics Model of Liver Tumor Radiofrequency Ablation

International audiencePurpose: We aim at developing a framework for the validation of a subject-specific multi-physics model of liver tumor radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: The RFA computation becomes subject-specific after several levels of personalization: geometrical and biophysical (hemodynamics, heat transfer and an extended cellular necrosis model). We present a comprehensive experimental setup combining multi-modal, pre-and post-operative anatomical and functional images, as well as the interventional monitoring of intra-operative signals: the temperature and delivered power. Results: To exploit this data set, an efficient processing pipeline is introduced, which copes with image noise, variable resolution and anisotropy. The validation study includes twelve ablations from five healthy pig livers: a mean point-to-mesh error between predicted and actual ablation extent of 5.3 ± 3.6 mm is achieved. Conclusion: This enables an end-to-end pre-clinical validation framework that considers the available data set

Deep learning-based left ventricular segmentation demonstrates improved performance on respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart reconstructions

IntroductionDeep learning (DL)-based segmentation has gained popularity for routine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image analysis and in particular, delineation of left ventricular (LV) borders for LV volume determination. Free-breathing, self-navigated, whole-heart CMR exams provide high-resolution, isotropic coverage of the heart for assessment of cardiac anatomy including LV volume. The combination of whole-heart free-breathing CMR and DL-based LV segmentation has the potential to streamline the acquisition and analysis of clinical CMR exams. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of a DL-based automatic LV segmentation network trained primarily on computed tomography (CT) images in two whole-heart CMR reconstruction methods: (1) an in-line respiratory motion-corrected (Mcorr) reconstruction and (2) an off-line, compressed sensing-based, multi-volume respiratory motion-resolved (Mres) reconstruction. Given that Mres images were shown to have greater image quality in previous studies than Mcorr images, we hypothesized that the LV volumes segmented from Mres images are closer to the manual expert-traced left ventricular endocardial border than the Mcorr images.MethodThis retrospective study used 15 patients who underwent clinically indicated 1.5 T CMR exams with a prototype ECG-gated 3D radial phyllotaxis balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) sequence. For each reconstruction method, the absolute volume difference (AVD) of the automatically and manually segmented LV volumes was used as the primary quantity to investigate whether 3D DL-based LV segmentation generalized better on Mcorr or Mres 3D whole-heart images. Additionally, we assessed the 3D Dice similarity coefficient between the manual and automatic LV masks of each reconstructed 3D whole-heart image and the sharpness of the LV myocardium-blood pool interface. A two-tail paired Student’s t-test (alpha = 0.05) was used to test the significance in this study.Results & DiscussionThe AVD in the respiratory Mres reconstruction was lower than the AVD in the respiratory Mcorr reconstruction: 7.73 ± 6.54 ml vs. 20.0 ± 22.4 ml, respectively (n = 15, p-value = 0.03). The 3D Dice coefficient between the DL-segmented masks and the manually segmented masks was higher for Mres images than for Mcorr images: 0.90 ± 0.02 vs. 0.87 ± 0.03 respectively, with a p-value = 0.02. Sharpness on Mres images was higher than on Mcorr images: 0.15 ± 0.05 vs. 0.12 ± 0.04, respectively, with a p-value of 0.014 (n = 15).ConclusionWe conclude that the DL-based 3D automatic LV segmentation network trained on CT images and fine-tuned on MR images generalized better on Mres images than on Mcorr images for quantifying LV volumes